Listening to NPR yesterday curled my toenails. Apparently, there is a backlash against the biofuel industry. Okay, so what's that mean? Here's what I heard yesterday:
Study: Ethanol Worse for Climate Than Gasoline
Farmland in Brazil is burned, in preparation for planting corn and beans. A new study finds that ethanol production drives such land clearing, contributing greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Corbis
All Things Considered, February 7, 2008 · At first blush, biofuels such as corn ethanol and soybean diesel seem like they would be great from the standpoint of global warming. The crops soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as they grow, and that balances out the carbon dioxide they produce when they're burned. But until now, nobody has fully analyzed all the ripple effects of this industry. And Tim Searchinger, a visiting scholar at Princeton University, says those effects turn out to be huge.
"The simplest explanation is that when we divert our corn or soybeans to fuel, if people around the world are going to continue to eat the same amount that they're already eating, you have to replace that food somewhere else," Searchinger says.
Searchinger and his colleagues looked globally to figure out where the new cropland is coming from, as American farmers produce fuel crops where they used to grow food. The answer is that biofuel production here is driving agriculture to expand in other parts of the world.
"That's done in a significant part by burning down forests, plowing up grasslands. That releases a great deal of carbon dioxide," Searchinger says.
In fact, Searchinger's group's study, published online by Science magazine, shows those actions end up releasing huge amounts of carbon dioxide. The study finds that over a 30-year span, biofuels end up contributing twice as much carbon dioxide to the air as that amount of gasoline would, when you add in the global effects.
"Right now there's little doubt that ethanol is making global warming worse," Searchinger says.
Searchinger's team says these fuels are turning out to be anything but environmentally friendly. Alex Farrell at the University of California, Berkeley agrees.
"I think this paper will have major implications for the use of biofuels around the world," Farrell says.
Here in the United States, the federal government is offering large subsidies to encourage corn-based ethanol. That's a boon to Midwestern farmers and provides a domestic supply of fuel. The Bush administration is calling for a vast expansion of this industry, as part of a plan to reduce gasoline consumption by 20 percent.
"If you care about greenhouse gases," Farrell says, "then this expansion of the corn biofuel industry is going in the wrong direction."
Farrell says the new study will clearly need to be verified with similar analyses, but he says the overall conclusion looks solid. And it's not just an academic matter. Federal law says future biofuel sources will eventually need to be certified as benefiting the climate. If the new study holds up to scrutiny, America's main biofuel industry, corn-based ethanol, would flunk that test.
"Well, what is their solution?" asks Matt Hartwig, a spokesman for the Renewable Fuels Association, a trade group. He says the world needs more energy and ethanol is filling a need.
"I mean, sure, today ethanol production or renewable fuel technology itself is not perfect. But it is evolving and becoming better," Hartwig says.
But the new study concludes that even vast efficiency improvements in ethanol production won't change the equation. As long as the starting material is grown on farmland, Searchinger says, biofuels will be bad for the planet.
But Alex Farrell at Berkeley sees a way out of this. He says the focus of the biofuels industry needs a rapid change of direction, away from using cropland — which is where most U.S. biofuels come from today — and toward other sources of starting material.
"We could replace all of the ethanol that we consume in California just using waste that goes to the landfill today, and turning that into ethanol," Farrell says.
Environmentally friendly biofuels could also be made from agricultural waste or grasses grown on land that's not suitable for crops. The biofuels industry is heading in that direction, but the technology to make use of fuels other than corn and soy is still in its infancy.
Well, that's interesting. When did any of us that are clear thinking supporters of biofuel so much as imply that we were talking about corn ethanol or soy diesel?!? Is this another case of the media and the more evil spin doctors manipulating us to believe that this is the problem?!? Wake up everyone!!! My fellow treehuggers, you were NOT talking about corn and soy! Don't let them think you were!!! We were all talking about composted waste and waste oil from those poison boxes (McD and the King) and even the holy grail of HEMP biofuel!!! What? Hemp? But that is a plant too, right?!? Won't that cause all the destruction that those other plants do?
The short answer is NO...and go read a book! The longer answer is that hemp requires less space and water than corn or soy AND it is multipurpose!!! Replace that corn with hemp and you don't just have a more nutritionally dense food source (more protein than soy!), but you also have fiber for cloth, rope and a plethora of other products...and it makes great biodiesel. If the current trend is toward corn and soy for fuel, DON'T BLAME US (Loraxes) --- someone is making money from those choices. NPR, you should be ashamed for perpetuating this spin, although I applaud your effort to balance it out at the end. Please, kids, don't believe the hype!!! This is not what we ordered! Send it back to the kitchen and make them do it right! I agree with the studies conclusions in that we MUST stop the powers that be from steering energy solutions toward these engineered crops that are raping the earth and giving nothing back. However, I take issue with the argument that we would have to expand production of corn and soy to maintain our food stores while growing for fuel. When the hell did we start running out of corn and soy?!? People, we have had a food surplus in this country alone since the early sixties!!! Farmers are subsidized for that very surplus every year. Don't shuffle blame for shortages away from the gross mismanagement of a surplus! They are trying to dupe us kids...keeping us confused robs of us of our collective power and makes them filthy rich.
This has been a public service announcement from your friendly neighborhood lunatic. Thanks.